The Globe and Mail has a story on how Facebook is banning pictures of mothers who breastfeed. Leaving aside the whole meta-Facebook argument, I don't see why Facebook has its panties up in such a bunch.
Sure they are an American company, and sure they are even more prudish then Canadians, but get a grip. I am of the camp that breastfeeding is a perfectly natural, normal thing. If a women wants to breastfeed in the mall, the library, or post her pictures on Facebook for her friends and family to see, let her. Who cares, its her privacy, let her violate it herself. Breastfeeding is not of a sexual natural, so we shouldn't stigmatize it.
Breasts are not our enemy.
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Monday, December 29, 2008
Last words on the Senate
Yes, I know, old news. But hey, it's the holidays. I am busy eating turkey, ragout, and other tasty treats from both sides of the Ottawa River.
I am honesty torn on the Conservative's appointment of these 18 new Senators, Stephen Harper has clearly gone back on his word on this issue. No one can deny this.
Prior to the 18 appointments, Stephen Harper has appointed only two other senators to the red chamber:
Should Harper have appointed 18 new Conservative Senators to the Senate while government was prorogued? Should Harper have broken his word and appointed these unelected Senators to the yet to be reformed Senate?
No, he shouldn't have, but he has every right to have done so. He should have attempted one more time to bring about some limited reforms to the Senate, he could have used the threat of his appointing Senators if that last attempted failed.
Now I know there are lots of arguments in favour of these appointments, the two main ones being:
So the Goverment's arguments in favour of appointments are weak, and I am not a supporter of this blatant promise breaking by Harper, so this must mean I am a secret coalition lover...or something. Just to set the record straight, no I am not. Now the opposition arguments against the appointments are weak and pathetic as well.
The NDP argued that the government shouldn't have appointed the senators, and doing so only shows they don't care about the economy. WTF? Dear NDP, the government needs to juggle more then one ball to be effective. The rest of the government cannot grind to a halt just because of the economy. Would the NDP have said these same comments if the government announced some more crown land being marked as federal park land to protect it from development? No, I don't think so. The other common NDP argument against the appointments was the cost of having these senators, I forget the exact amount, but it was something like 50 million in pay and perks over their 8 year term. Of course we would have saved 240 million+ over the same 8 years had the NDP joined the Conservatives in getting rid of public subsidies for political parties.
The NDP arguments against are silly.
The Liberals argue that Harper is out of line for appointing these Senators while the goverment is prorogued. They argue some claptrap about being in a constitutional greyzone. They are completely wrong on this point.
But according to a constitutional expert, Harper isn't out of line in making the appointments. Both main opposition parties completely fail in their arguments against the Senate appointments. Is it really any wonder how the Conservatives manage to out think, out play, and out last the opposition parties? The worse thing is we can expect more of the same in 2009 as 8 more senators retire.
I am honesty torn on the Conservative's appointment of these 18 new Senators, Stephen Harper has clearly gone back on his word on this issue. No one can deny this.
Prior to the 18 appointments, Stephen Harper has appointed only two other senators to the red chamber:
- Michael Fortier (to represent Montreal in the Cabinet)
- Bert Brown (elected senator-in-waiting from Alberta)
Should Harper have appointed 18 new Conservative Senators to the Senate while government was prorogued? Should Harper have broken his word and appointed these unelected Senators to the yet to be reformed Senate?
No, he shouldn't have, but he has every right to have done so. He should have attempted one more time to bring about some limited reforms to the Senate, he could have used the threat of his appointing Senators if that last attempted failed.
Now I know there are lots of arguments in favour of these appointments, the two main ones being:
- If we don't do it, then the coalition will, and they might appoint a separatist.
- The Senate isn't functioning well, there are not enough Conservative Senators to sit in on the committees.
So the Goverment's arguments in favour of appointments are weak, and I am not a supporter of this blatant promise breaking by Harper, so this must mean I am a secret coalition lover...or something. Just to set the record straight, no I am not. Now the opposition arguments against the appointments are weak and pathetic as well.
The NDP argued that the government shouldn't have appointed the senators, and doing so only shows they don't care about the economy. WTF? Dear NDP, the government needs to juggle more then one ball to be effective. The rest of the government cannot grind to a halt just because of the economy. Would the NDP have said these same comments if the government announced some more crown land being marked as federal park land to protect it from development? No, I don't think so. The other common NDP argument against the appointments was the cost of having these senators, I forget the exact amount, but it was something like 50 million in pay and perks over their 8 year term. Of course we would have saved 240 million+ over the same 8 years had the NDP joined the Conservatives in getting rid of public subsidies for political parties.
The NDP arguments against are silly.
The Liberals argue that Harper is out of line for appointing these Senators while the goverment is prorogued. They argue some claptrap about being in a constitutional greyzone. They are completely wrong on this point.
But according to a constitutional expert, Harper isn't out of line in making the appointments. Both main opposition parties completely fail in their arguments against the Senate appointments. Is it really any wonder how the Conservatives manage to out think, out play, and out last the opposition parties? The worse thing is we can expect more of the same in 2009 as 8 more senators retire.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
If you use Internet Explorer, read this now
The "zero-day" vulnerability, which came to light last week, allows criminals to take over victims' machines simply by steering them to infected Web sites; users don't have to download anything for their computers to get infected, which makes the flaw in Internet Explorer's programming code so dangerous. Internet Explorer is the world's most widely used Web browser.
While the exploits and patches for Microsoft patches have been reduced greatly over the past year or two, there are still way too many.
This is why I use Firefox, and to some extent Chrome.
Don't use IE!
While the exploits and patches for Microsoft patches have been reduced greatly over the past year or two, there are still way too many.
This is why I use Firefox, and to some extent Chrome.
Don't use IE!
When idiots speak
Thanks Daimnation for posting this and making me laugh out loud. Props to you sir!
For those of you who are not sure what a "Flight Sergeant" is, it is basically the air equivalent of the army's "Warrant Officer". In the Royal Canadian Air Cadets to be a "Flight Sergeant" you need to meet the following requirements:
As you can easily see above, these qualifications do make you an expert in aerial warfare.
You know, I retired as the "Commanding Officer" of my army cadet corps back in the day. I think that makes me qualified to lead the next rotation in Afghanistan. If not, well, at least a senate seat.
For those of you who are not sure what a "Flight Sergeant" is, it is basically the air equivalent of the army's "Warrant Officer". In the Royal Canadian Air Cadets to be a "Flight Sergeant" you need to meet the following requirements:
- complete at least six months satisfactory service at the substantive rank of Sgt;
- successfully complete proficiency level 4 of the LHQ training program; and
- preferably have successfully completed an Advanced Specialty Summer Course;
As you can easily see above, these qualifications do make you an expert in aerial warfare.
You know, I retired as the "Commanding Officer" of my army cadet corps back in the day. I think that makes me qualified to lead the next rotation in Afghanistan. If not, well, at least a senate seat.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
The Detroit 3: DNR
Over the past few days the pundits and analysts have taken to using medical terms to describe the bailouts for the Detroit 3 automakers. Or as I am starting to call them, the "Beggar Three".
"This report says that Canada is better off providing life-support to GM and Chrysler, because the demise of auto in Canada is the economic equivalent of a nuclear freeze, with catastrophic effects that would knock us into a deep recession," Bryant said Tuesday.
"We are talking about CPR, literally, CPR for a company to avoid it from going under and causing a chain of events that would be catastrophic to the economy."
Perhaps invoking medical terms is meant to bring out an emotional response?
Well, I think the beggar three need to have a big ol'DNR tattooed to their chests. If they croak, they croak. Whatever governments do, do not resuscitate them. Bad corporate decisions should not be alleviated with taxpayer dollars. Auto bailouts don't exactly have a track record of success either, at least when they were attempted in Great Britain in the seventies and eighties.
Instead of giving billions to companies that are failing, partly subsidized by you and I, and partly subsidized by actual successful companies focus on
I also don't really believe in that 582,000 job loss figure either. It doesn't make sense. It only makes sense if everyone stops buying cars when/if the big three go down.
The big three sell (which aren't even the big three anymore) about 750,000 (estimate based on car and truck sales from June 08 rounded down a lot) cars and trucks in Canada every year. Someone will have to make these cars if they big three go belly up. That means the successful companies like Toyota will have to start to make more cars, they will need to hire more people to build these cars. The plants and the people are here in Canada and in the US, they will hire most of these people back.
I agree that there will be a lot of short term pain, but I can't see how prolonging the pain is any better. Some of these people will need to retrain regardless of a bailout, might as well start now. Ontario needs to diversify it's economy to survive long term, might as well start now. I agree it can seem cold hearted, but it is required.
DNR the Detroit Three. Don't bailout incompetence, job guarantees are meaningless if the company itself dies in a year or two anyway.
"This report says that Canada is better off providing life-support to GM and Chrysler, because the demise of auto in Canada is the economic equivalent of a nuclear freeze, with catastrophic effects that would knock us into a deep recession," Bryant said Tuesday.
"We are talking about CPR, literally, CPR for a company to avoid it from going under and causing a chain of events that would be catastrophic to the economy."
Perhaps invoking medical terms is meant to bring out an emotional response?
Well, I think the beggar three need to have a big ol'DNR tattooed to their chests. If they croak, they croak. Whatever governments do, do not resuscitate them. Bad corporate decisions should not be alleviated with taxpayer dollars. Auto bailouts don't exactly have a track record of success either, at least when they were attempted in Great Britain in the seventies and eighties.
Instead of giving billions to companies that are failing, partly subsidized by you and I, and partly subsidized by actual successful companies focus on
- EI program improvements
- Skills training
- etc
I also don't really believe in that 582,000 job loss figure either. It doesn't make sense. It only makes sense if everyone stops buying cars when/if the big three go down.
The big three sell (which aren't even the big three anymore) about 750,000 (estimate based on car and truck sales from June 08 rounded down a lot) cars and trucks in Canada every year. Someone will have to make these cars if they big three go belly up. That means the successful companies like Toyota will have to start to make more cars, they will need to hire more people to build these cars. The plants and the people are here in Canada and in the US, they will hire most of these people back.
I agree that there will be a lot of short term pain, but I can't see how prolonging the pain is any better. Some of these people will need to retrain regardless of a bailout, might as well start now. Ontario needs to diversify it's economy to survive long term, might as well start now. I agree it can seem cold hearted, but it is required.
DNR the Detroit Three. Don't bailout incompetence, job guarantees are meaningless if the company itself dies in a year or two anyway.
One small step for Danny, one big step for Communism?
Danny Williams expropriates the hydroelectric assets, water and timber rights of AbitibiBowater Inc. This move is surely to cool anyone wanting to invest in NFLD.
Under the legislation, all of AbitibiBowater's assets except for its pulp and paper mill in the central Newfoundland town will be owned by Nalcor, a recently established provincial Crown corporation. Those assets include dams and power stations.
What the heck? Does Danny expect to run a mill as a crown corporation? A mill that has been described as the most expensive one in North America?
And it typical Danny arrogance, Danny may negotiate with AbitibiBowater for the value of the hydro-electric assets, but maybe not. Perhaps Danny the Dictator will just decide what it's worth himself and sign a cheque telling them to get lost? Or perhaps he will give them nothing? You never know with Comrade Danny.
Under the legislation, all of AbitibiBowater's assets except for its pulp and paper mill in the central Newfoundland town will be owned by Nalcor, a recently established provincial Crown corporation. Those assets include dams and power stations.
What the heck? Does Danny expect to run a mill as a crown corporation? A mill that has been described as the most expensive one in North America?
And it typical Danny arrogance, Danny may negotiate with AbitibiBowater for the value of the hydro-electric assets, but maybe not. Perhaps Danny the Dictator will just decide what it's worth himself and sign a cheque telling them to get lost? Or perhaps he will give them nothing? You never know with Comrade Danny.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Stephen Harper sans bloopers
You can watch Stephen Harper on CTV Atlantic here and here.
I wonder where the blooper reel is where Stephen Harper has to have the question repeated back to him several times.
Oh wait, you won't. Stephen Harper has a plan, and a vision for Canada. Even if you don't agree with him or his vision, you have to agree he knows where he wants to go.
I wonder where the blooper reel is where Stephen Harper has to have the question repeated back to him several times.
Oh wait, you won't. Stephen Harper has a plan, and a vision for Canada. Even if you don't agree with him or his vision, you have to agree he knows where he wants to go.
Bullets, not shoes
Good thing this man didn't have a gun.
The Secret Service were pretty slow in responding I would say. Anyway, alls well that ends well.
The Secret Service were pretty slow in responding I would say. Anyway, alls well that ends well.
Smarter and more progressive eh?
Quebec has long been held up as model for the rest of Canada. They are supposedly smarter, more progressive, more environmentally aware, more politically savvy etc. Well, most of that is now nothing but hogwash.
According to a new survey, 70% of Quebecers don't even know how our system of government even works.
Overall, the survey found the lowest levels of knowledge in Quebec -- 70 per cent of Quebecers, for example, wrongly believe Canadians directly elect the prime minister. Only 35 per cent of Atlantic Canadians made that mistake.
This survey also smashes the oft heard argument that Quebecers supported the coalition in such numbers because they alone new how the government was supposed to work. Since they were so intellectually superior.
Well my friends, it seems that Quebecers support the coalition not because they supposedly knew how the system was supposed to work (they didn't). They supported the coalition because they knew they would be bribed repeatedly to support it.
According to a new survey, 70% of Quebecers don't even know how our system of government even works.
Overall, the survey found the lowest levels of knowledge in Quebec -- 70 per cent of Quebecers, for example, wrongly believe Canadians directly elect the prime minister. Only 35 per cent of Atlantic Canadians made that mistake.
This survey also smashes the oft heard argument that Quebecers supported the coalition in such numbers because they alone new how the government was supposed to work. Since they were so intellectually superior.
Well my friends, it seems that Quebecers support the coalition not because they supposedly knew how the system was supposed to work (they didn't). They supported the coalition because they knew they would be bribed repeatedly to support it.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Clearly inconsistent
NDP talking points about the 18 appointments to the Senate are clearly inconsistent. While they do talk about their opposition to the Senate as a whole, they also talk about the cost of this.
The NDP talk about the increased costs of filling these 18 seats, and how it would save six million dollars each and every year. But, when it comes to saving thirty million dollars each and every year in the form of political party subsidies, the NDP would band together with separatists to save their subsidies.
Clearly inconsistent, clearly NDP.
The NDP talk about the increased costs of filling these 18 seats, and how it would save six million dollars each and every year. But, when it comes to saving thirty million dollars each and every year in the form of political party subsidies, the NDP would band together with separatists to save their subsidies.
Clearly inconsistent, clearly NDP.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Do you think it's izzy to stay consistent?
Well, I guess we can no longer use this line everyday when talking about the Liberals. Too bad.
Newly anointed Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has smashed his own credibility in the very first interview he did.
"Those are appropriate subjects for us to talk about, but I made it clear that I don't want to get into secret negotiations or back-door deals," said Ignatieff, who was appointed by the Liberal party's national executive on Wednesday to replace Stéphane Dion.
Uhm, OK.
Ignatieff said he also spoke briefly with NDP Leader Jack Layton and Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe on Wednesday and informed them that he "saw no reason" to renegotiate the coalition agreement made by his predecessor Dion.
Iggy this is exactly what your beloved Liberal party did. They entered into secret negotiations with the party that would destroy the economy, and the party that would destroy the country. Secret negotiations. In Canada. We're not allowed to make this up.
So I call in Iggy to renounce this coalition negotiated in secrecy, behind closed doors with both the separatists, and the socialists. Democracy only flourishes in the light. Sorry Iggy, you just lost credibility.
Renounce the coalition, demand the Governor General to call an election should the government fall. You're not afraid to plead your case with the public are you?
Polls got you scared?
Newly anointed Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has smashed his own credibility in the very first interview he did.
"Those are appropriate subjects for us to talk about, but I made it clear that I don't want to get into secret negotiations or back-door deals," said Ignatieff, who was appointed by the Liberal party's national executive on Wednesday to replace Stéphane Dion.
Uhm, OK.
Ignatieff said he also spoke briefly with NDP Leader Jack Layton and Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe on Wednesday and informed them that he "saw no reason" to renegotiate the coalition agreement made by his predecessor Dion.
Iggy this is exactly what your beloved Liberal party did. They entered into secret negotiations with the party that would destroy the economy, and the party that would destroy the country. Secret negotiations. In Canada. We're not allowed to make this up.
So I call in Iggy to renounce this coalition negotiated in secrecy, behind closed doors with both the separatists, and the socialists. Democracy only flourishes in the light. Sorry Iggy, you just lost credibility.
Renounce the coalition, demand the Governor General to call an election should the government fall. You're not afraid to plead your case with the public are you?
Polls got you scared?
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Lessons Learned
In a previous post about annoying, and near continuous fundraising emails many readers were surprised by my annoyance at this, and my desire to see a more conciliatory Conservative government.
They mentioned that the Conservatives were better then the Liberals. (doh)
They mentioned the the Prime Minister's role was to advance the Conservative's agenda. And they mentioned that part of the Prime Minister's role is to defeat his political opponents.
Prime Minister's role is to govern the country in the best interests of Canadians, doing his best to look out for everyone. Of course he is a Conservative, and will propose Conservative ideas. That I agree with. And I agree with cutting the subsidy, but it is a minority government, and we have to be aware of that.
The impetus of this coalition was the fundraising debacle in the economic update. Had the government proposed to phase out the subsidy rather then cut it out cold turkey this whole thing might have been avoided.
This whole debacle could have been avoided, and while Canadians soundly rejected a coalition government led by Stephane Dion, Canadians are also mad at Stephen Harper for his handling of the whole thing. Had the Governor General denied the Prime Minister's request to prorogue, we could now be looking at a coalition government led by the hapless Dion. We Conservatives were lucky. We Conservatives must not forget that.
This isn't to say the coalition was right, but it was technically proper. And while I don't agree with taking power via procedural wrangling, it was legal, and it could still occur in January. We Conservatives must not forget that.
I for one, do not welcome new Liberal/Socialist/Separatist Overlords, and would prefer to see the Prime Minister make a honest effort at reaching out towards the parties. Obviously we will not agree with many of their ideas, but there is common ground to be found with the Liberals. Even now the government is considering stimulus packages that are not very Conservative.
The mere act of publicly reaching out, and find this common ground will neutered the coalition. If the Conservatives don't act properly, and turn all partisan again Canadians may well support a coalition under Iggy. Public opinion polls have a Liberal party under Iggy very competitive with the Conservatives.
The Prime Minster must take responsibility for his actions. That is what a leader does. The Prime Minister must lead from the top, and set the tone of parliament. With a new Liberal leader (and by accounts a strong leader), we will not be blessed with an absent opposition.
Take aways from this whole debacle:
1. Don't be partisan all the time.
2. Consult the opposition on issues that have the potential to severely weaken, or even destroy your opponents.
3. Govern with all Canadians in mind.
4. Try to find common ground with the opposition parties. Be public about this, perhaps invite the opposition leaders for a weekly meeting to discuss the budget preparations, make sure the media knows about it.
5. Not everything has to be a wedge issue.
And for the record, I for one want to see the Liberal and other parties survive, a single party system is not democracy.
And yes, I am still a Conservative, but we must learn from our mistakes so we don't repeat them. The path to our majority lies in earning the trust of Canadians, and despite the public's reaction to the coalition, we didn't earn any trust from Canadians.
They mentioned that the Conservatives were better then the Liberals. (doh)
They mentioned the the Prime Minister's role was to advance the Conservative's agenda. And they mentioned that part of the Prime Minister's role is to defeat his political opponents.
Prime Minister's role is to govern the country in the best interests of Canadians, doing his best to look out for everyone. Of course he is a Conservative, and will propose Conservative ideas. That I agree with. And I agree with cutting the subsidy, but it is a minority government, and we have to be aware of that.
The impetus of this coalition was the fundraising debacle in the economic update. Had the government proposed to phase out the subsidy rather then cut it out cold turkey this whole thing might have been avoided.
This whole debacle could have been avoided, and while Canadians soundly rejected a coalition government led by Stephane Dion, Canadians are also mad at Stephen Harper for his handling of the whole thing. Had the Governor General denied the Prime Minister's request to prorogue, we could now be looking at a coalition government led by the hapless Dion. We Conservatives were lucky. We Conservatives must not forget that.
This isn't to say the coalition was right, but it was technically proper. And while I don't agree with taking power via procedural wrangling, it was legal, and it could still occur in January. We Conservatives must not forget that.
I for one, do not welcome new Liberal/Socialist/Separatist Overlords, and would prefer to see the Prime Minister make a honest effort at reaching out towards the parties. Obviously we will not agree with many of their ideas, but there is common ground to be found with the Liberals. Even now the government is considering stimulus packages that are not very Conservative.
The mere act of publicly reaching out, and find this common ground will neutered the coalition. If the Conservatives don't act properly, and turn all partisan again Canadians may well support a coalition under Iggy. Public opinion polls have a Liberal party under Iggy very competitive with the Conservatives.
The Prime Minster must take responsibility for his actions. That is what a leader does. The Prime Minister must lead from the top, and set the tone of parliament. With a new Liberal leader (and by accounts a strong leader), we will not be blessed with an absent opposition.
Take aways from this whole debacle:
1. Don't be partisan all the time.
2. Consult the opposition on issues that have the potential to severely weaken, or even destroy your opponents.
3. Govern with all Canadians in mind.
4. Try to find common ground with the opposition parties. Be public about this, perhaps invite the opposition leaders for a weekly meeting to discuss the budget preparations, make sure the media knows about it.
5. Not everything has to be a wedge issue.
And for the record, I for one want to see the Liberal and other parties survive, a single party system is not democracy.
And yes, I am still a Conservative, but we must learn from our mistakes so we don't repeat them. The path to our majority lies in earning the trust of Canadians, and despite the public's reaction to the coalition, we didn't earn any trust from Canadians.
Oo-la-la MSM recognition
I decided it wasn't worth braving the drive home just yet, I figure I had better wait a bit to let the traffic thin and the blows to clear the roads. So with nothing better to do I decide to Google "imrightasrain" as see what was out in the wild.
I found some interesting links, and neat referrals, but one of the last search results I clicked on is the holy grail for almost every single blogger in the known universe. That's right, mainstream media recognition.
I think I feel my head swelling.
A blog that promises crusty, intelligent, insightful, right-of-centre venting. That's a lot of promises. See for yourself whether they're kept.
http://imrightasrain.blogspot.com/
I am not sure how I missed this in ultra-election mode, but there it is, my blog mentioned in the mainstream media as one worth watching.
Whomever wrote that CanWest article thought it was worth watching, so what does everyone else think? Does this blog make you think? Do you agree with what you read? Do you disagree? Is it informative, or dismiss me as a crackpot? I know I am pretty partisan at times, but I am also not afraid to bash on the Conservative party from time to time either. So, let me know how I can make this blog a better and more interesting read.
I found some interesting links, and neat referrals, but one of the last search results I clicked on is the holy grail for almost every single blogger in the known universe. That's right, mainstream media recognition.
I think I feel my head swelling.
A blog that promises crusty, intelligent, insightful, right-of-centre venting. That's a lot of promises. See for yourself whether they're kept.
http://imrightasrain.blogspot.com/
I am not sure how I missed this in ultra-election mode, but there it is, my blog mentioned in the mainstream media as one worth watching.
Whomever wrote that CanWest article thought it was worth watching, so what does everyone else think? Does this blog make you think? Do you agree with what you read? Do you disagree? Is it informative, or dismiss me as a crackpot? I know I am pretty partisan at times, but I am also not afraid to bash on the Conservative party from time to time either. So, let me know how I can make this blog a better and more interesting read.
Conservative Fundraising: Getting Pathetic
I am starting to get sick of getting these emails every few days. And this email annoys me for its petty partisanship, and willingness to drive wedge issues home. It is time to stop thinking like this, and time to start thinking collaboratively.
From the email:
We need to drive that wedge home and convince Canadians of all political stripes that this Coalition does nothing but weaken our nation.
It seems that the Conservative brain trust considers the coalition is a wedge issue, whereas it is really a trust issue. The Prime Minister must reach out to the opposition parties and make an honest effort to bring the best of their ideas into the budget. We must honestly try and work together.
I agree with removing funding from political parties, I agree with not spending 30 billion on a stimulus package until after we see what the Americans and other G20 nations do, I just don't agree with how this was all done.
Stéphane Dion has resigned as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, and by extension, of the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition. In yet another stunning and unprecedented demonstration of Liberal contempt for our democratic rights, they've decided to appoint a new leader in his place.
Not only was the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition not elected to govern this country , but the person who would become Canada's Prime Minister wasn't even the leader of a federal party during the last election and may not even be elected by the Liberal (or any) party's membership .
The Liberals have decided to parachute Michael Ignatieff into the position of Prime Minister, and one thing is clear: Canadians didn't elect this coalition to form a government , and they most certainly didn't elect Michael Ignatieff as Prime Minister .
The Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition would be a disaster for Canada's economy, and for our democracy.
Canadians need and deserve an elected government and a Prime Minister that will focus on the economy. In these uncertain times, that is the number one priority.
Please follow this link to make a donation of $200 or $100, and help us spread this message to Canadians. We need your help now to crack the coalition and put a stop to the political games in Ottawa before the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition do even more damage to our democracy.
Cracks in the coalition are already starting to show. Members of the Liberal Party are already acknowledging that the Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition was ill-conceived, undemocratic and potentially ruinous for Canada. We need to drive that wedge home and convince Canadians of all political stripes that this Coalition does nothing but weaken our nation.
Make no mistake: Stephane Dion, Bob Rae, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe will continue to do whatever it takes to force their coalition into power. From day one, the Liberals' backroom coalition has been nothing but a naked power grab.
Please follow this link to make a donation to help us crack this coalition and send the message that a democratic, duly-elected government will put Canadians' priorities first.
Yours Sincerely,
Doug Finley
National Campaign Chair
Conservative Party of Canada
P.S. – The Liberals were rejected by Canadians at the ballot box to govern this country – as were the NDP and Bloc. They are trying to seize power by making backroom deals and parachuting in a Prime Minister who didn't even lead a party at the last election. Please make your emergency donation now and help crack the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition.
From the email:
We need to drive that wedge home and convince Canadians of all political stripes that this Coalition does nothing but weaken our nation.
It seems that the Conservative brain trust considers the coalition is a wedge issue, whereas it is really a trust issue. The Prime Minister must reach out to the opposition parties and make an honest effort to bring the best of their ideas into the budget. We must honestly try and work together.
I agree with removing funding from political parties, I agree with not spending 30 billion on a stimulus package until after we see what the Americans and other G20 nations do, I just don't agree with how this was all done.
Stéphane Dion has resigned as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, and by extension, of the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition. In yet another stunning and unprecedented demonstration of Liberal contempt for our democratic rights, they've decided to appoint a new leader in his place.
Not only was the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition not elected to govern this country , but the person who would become Canada's Prime Minister wasn't even the leader of a federal party during the last election and may not even be elected by the Liberal (or any) party's membership .
The Liberals have decided to parachute Michael Ignatieff into the position of Prime Minister, and one thing is clear: Canadians didn't elect this coalition to form a government , and they most certainly didn't elect Michael Ignatieff as Prime Minister .
The Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition would be a disaster for Canada's economy, and for our democracy.
Canadians need and deserve an elected government and a Prime Minister that will focus on the economy. In these uncertain times, that is the number one priority.
Please follow this link to make a donation of $200 or $100, and help us spread this message to Canadians. We need your help now to crack the coalition and put a stop to the political games in Ottawa before the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition do even more damage to our democracy.
Cracks in the coalition are already starting to show. Members of the Liberal Party are already acknowledging that the Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition was ill-conceived, undemocratic and potentially ruinous for Canada. We need to drive that wedge home and convince Canadians of all political stripes that this Coalition does nothing but weaken our nation.
Make no mistake: Stephane Dion, Bob Rae, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe will continue to do whatever it takes to force their coalition into power. From day one, the Liberals' backroom coalition has been nothing but a naked power grab.
Please follow this link to make a donation to help us crack this coalition and send the message that a democratic, duly-elected government will put Canadians' priorities first.
Yours Sincerely,
Doug Finley
National Campaign Chair
Conservative Party of Canada
P.S. – The Liberals were rejected by Canadians at the ballot box to govern this country – as were the NDP and Bloc. They are trying to seize power by making backroom deals and parachuting in a Prime Minister who didn't even lead a party at the last election. Please make your emergency donation now and help crack the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition.
What if all car reviews were like this?!
I thought it was time to lighten up a bit and have something funny. This, is funny. Watch, you won't be disappointed. I hope my next car can hit the beaches with the Royal Marines too! :)
I wonder if the cup holders in my car is the perfect size for smoke grenades?
I wonder if the cup holders in my car is the perfect size for smoke grenades?
Monday, December 8, 2008
Tired half-truths
CAITI-ONLINE is running another tired old piece about the letter Stephen Harper sent to the Governor General way back in September 2004.
I have only two things two say about this blog post:
1. It was only a letter, not a signed agreement, all three parties would have had to work issue by issue to pass a budget or or bill. It wasn't a signed agreement promising anyone anything. And even in that case, I still think that the GG should dissolve parliament and have an election.
2. How come when Stephen Harper and Gilles Duceppe have a press conference there is a row of Canadian flags behind them, but when Dion, Duceppe, and Layton sign an agreement there are only two flags well off to the sides?
I have only two things two say about this blog post:
1. It was only a letter, not a signed agreement, all three parties would have had to work issue by issue to pass a budget or or bill. It wasn't a signed agreement promising anyone anything. And even in that case, I still think that the GG should dissolve parliament and have an election.
2. How come when Stephen Harper and Gilles Duceppe have a press conference there is a row of Canadian flags behind them, but when Dion, Duceppe, and Layton sign an agreement there are only two flags well off to the sides?
Liberals just don't "get" Democracy
There is word that the Liberal Leader Stephane Dion will step down as the party's leader as early as today. This is good news for the Liberal Party. The Liberal Party was understandably gun shy about showing external divisions after the Chretien/Martin debacle a few years ago, and were very eager to show solidarity and rally behind their leader. With Dion, this was surely a case of the "Peter Principle" if there ever was one.
With Dion on his way out, perhaps as early as today, perhaps as late as this Wednesday Liberals must be salivating at the prospective of rebuilding their party, and continuing on their long and arduous "renewal" process. But this process is about to hit a massive speed bump, a speed bump named Michael Ignatieff.
Michael Ignatieff's supporters have proposed that the Liberal leadership race be accelerated, and to have the Liberal caucus choose the next leader of their party. What an affront to grass roots democracy, and the will of the Liberal Party members.
The Rae camp says that choosing a leader behind closed doors is not the right move for the Liberal party.
I never thought thought that I would agree with Bob Rae, and I certainly never thought I would hope that Bob Rae wins the Liberal leadership contest. Michael Ignatieff is just another Liberal entitled to his entitlements, he doesn't want to face the members of the party that he holds so dear, he doesn't have the courage to fight a leadership race. He simply wants to be anointed, so he will be able to assume the head of the "natural governing party of Canada". He wants his crack at being Prime Minister. I wonder if his views on the coalition will change if he wins the leadership race, assumes the leadership, and gets another chance to throw the Liberal/NDP/Bloc's ill conceived coalition in the electorates faces and assume power through outdated constitutional means instead of through the electorate.
Bob Rae at least has the idea, one vote per party member. Though his desire to push the coalition through by any and all means to assume power simply makes him as well, yet another Liberal entitled to his entitlements.
Mr. Dion appeared to be open to changing his mind about defeating Mr. Harper's government, saying that a “monumental change” on Mr. Harper's part would alter that.
That phrase angered some Liberals, who began shouting at Mr. Dion, accusing him of not going far enough, according to a caucus insider. That is when Mr. Rae approached the microphone, telling Mr. Dion that even “monumental change” was not acceptable.
Mr. Dion appeared shocked, the insider said.
So plus one for Rae's views on one member, one vote, a big minus one hundred for his desire to punish Canadians with his separatist coalition for having the audacity of voting for a party other then the Liberals. Bob Rae apparently doesn't understand how democracy is supposed to work, if the government works with the opposition parties, then it behooves the opposition parties to work with the government in a honest and fair way.
Of course I am really not sure why Rae is going to campaign so hard for the coalition, a coalition that is not popular with electorate, a coalition that is fracturing the Liberal caucus, he is simply using the coalition to galvanize his base, and act as the rallying cry for his supporters that are in the left side of the party. Or perhaps to drive home the point that the NDP and Liberals should merge and become one party. And Canadian's don't really want Rae as the leader of the Liberal party, with only 22% of Canadians supporting Rae as the Liberal leader, you really have to wonder what is going on in that once proud party. Rae could lead the Liberals to an even worse showing then Dion with his rock bottom popularity, and his fanatical desire to shove an unpopular undemocratic coalition down the throats of Canadian voters.
Hmmm, on reflection, Bob Rae for Liberal leader does indeed seem like a good idea.
With Dion on his way out, perhaps as early as today, perhaps as late as this Wednesday Liberals must be salivating at the prospective of rebuilding their party, and continuing on their long and arduous "renewal" process. But this process is about to hit a massive speed bump, a speed bump named Michael Ignatieff.
Michael Ignatieff's supporters have proposed that the Liberal leadership race be accelerated, and to have the Liberal caucus choose the next leader of their party. What an affront to grass roots democracy, and the will of the Liberal Party members.
The Rae camp says that choosing a leader behind closed doors is not the right move for the Liberal party.
I never thought thought that I would agree with Bob Rae, and I certainly never thought I would hope that Bob Rae wins the Liberal leadership contest. Michael Ignatieff is just another Liberal entitled to his entitlements, he doesn't want to face the members of the party that he holds so dear, he doesn't have the courage to fight a leadership race. He simply wants to be anointed, so he will be able to assume the head of the "natural governing party of Canada". He wants his crack at being Prime Minister. I wonder if his views on the coalition will change if he wins the leadership race, assumes the leadership, and gets another chance to throw the Liberal/NDP/Bloc's ill conceived coalition in the electorates faces and assume power through outdated constitutional means instead of through the electorate.
Bob Rae at least has the idea, one vote per party member. Though his desire to push the coalition through by any and all means to assume power simply makes him as well, yet another Liberal entitled to his entitlements.
Mr. Dion appeared to be open to changing his mind about defeating Mr. Harper's government, saying that a “monumental change” on Mr. Harper's part would alter that.
That phrase angered some Liberals, who began shouting at Mr. Dion, accusing him of not going far enough, according to a caucus insider. That is when Mr. Rae approached the microphone, telling Mr. Dion that even “monumental change” was not acceptable.
Mr. Dion appeared shocked, the insider said.
So plus one for Rae's views on one member, one vote, a big minus one hundred for his desire to punish Canadians with his separatist coalition for having the audacity of voting for a party other then the Liberals. Bob Rae apparently doesn't understand how democracy is supposed to work, if the government works with the opposition parties, then it behooves the opposition parties to work with the government in a honest and fair way.
Of course I am really not sure why Rae is going to campaign so hard for the coalition, a coalition that is not popular with electorate, a coalition that is fracturing the Liberal caucus, he is simply using the coalition to galvanize his base, and act as the rallying cry for his supporters that are in the left side of the party. Or perhaps to drive home the point that the NDP and Liberals should merge and become one party. And Canadian's don't really want Rae as the leader of the Liberal party, with only 22% of Canadians supporting Rae as the Liberal leader, you really have to wonder what is going on in that once proud party. Rae could lead the Liberals to an even worse showing then Dion with his rock bottom popularity, and his fanatical desire to shove an unpopular undemocratic coalition down the throats of Canadian voters.
Hmmm, on reflection, Bob Rae for Liberal leader does indeed seem like a good idea.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
I'm with Steyn
Mark Steyn has written a pretty insightful commentary on the media's response to the Mumbai terrorist attacks.
The veteran British TV anchor Jon Snow, on the other hand, opted for the more cryptic locution “practitioners.” “Practitioners” of what, exactly?
Practitioners? As in practitioners of terror? What the heck...
Why is the media and pundit-o-cracy so afraid to call a spade a spade? Islamic terrorists is a bad word, so we call them militants, or gunmen. But a Jew is ultra-conservative?
Accidental my butt.
The veteran British TV anchor Jon Snow, on the other hand, opted for the more cryptic locution “practitioners.” “Practitioners” of what, exactly?
Practitioners? As in practitioners of terror? What the heck...
Why is the media and pundit-o-cracy so afraid to call a spade a spade? Islamic terrorists is a bad word, so we call them militants, or gunmen. But a Jew is ultra-conservative?
Accidental my butt.
Thursday, December 4, 2008
The GG has agreed to prorogue Parliament.
The Governor General has agreed to prorogue Parliament.
Interesting times.
Interesting times.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
The Party that wants to run Canada?
Can't even shoot a video in focus, nor deliver it on time. Pathetic.
Here is the article, and here is the time line pasted for convenience.
"I'm told that (Bloc Quebecois Leader) Gilles Duceppe ran into Mr. Dion in the elevator and asked 'What the hell happened?' and Mr. Dion said, 'We're not used to being in opposition," Fife said.
"I apologize for what happened tonight. I apologize for the poor quality and the lateness. I am livid and am doing an investigation as to how this happened,"
And when you tank the economy thanks to your socialist buddies will you hold an investigation as well?
Rally for Canada.
Here is the article, and here is the time line pasted for convenience.
- 6:15-6:30 - The Liberals miss their promised deadline to deliver Dion's statement to the television networks.
- 6:40 - Liberals arrive with a single tape at the press gallery in Ottawa. They were supposed to deliver two tapes: one in French, one in English. They arrived with a single tape in DVD-minicam format, which is not broadcast quality.
- Shortly after 6:40 - The Liberals decide to run back to their offices -- a block away -- because the French portion of the tape needs another edit.
- 7:05 - Liberal staffers are still in their offices as the networks go to air with the Harper address.
- 7:07 - Harper's statement finishes and network anchors are forced to kill time as they wait for Dion's address.
- 7:10 to 7:15 - Liberal staffers arrive back at the press gallery on Wellington Street with a DVD-minicam player that they had taken from their own offices, along with the associated cables. There is still only one tape, not two. A press gallery official tells the Liberals that the gallery is not the feed point and an argument ensues. The Liberals ask why they weren't told that earlier. The feed point is next door at the CBC building, which is the long-established feed play point for all network pools. The Liberals are informed that they need to be walked into the building by authorized staff.
- 7:20 - English network anchors are still live on television, wondering where the tape is. CTV has still had no communications from the Liberals about Dion's address.
- Approximately 7:15 - CBC receives the tape and begins dubbing into French and English versions. This takes about 10 minutes.
- 7:28 - CTV decides to go off-air and back to regular scheduled programming at 7:30. CTV has still not seen a feed of the tape.
- 7:28 - CBC incorrectly punches out the finished feed only to their network.
- 7:30 - CTV signs off broadcast at scheduled time.
"I'm told that (Bloc Quebecois Leader) Gilles Duceppe ran into Mr. Dion in the elevator and asked 'What the hell happened?' and Mr. Dion said, 'We're not used to being in opposition," Fife said.
"I apologize for what happened tonight. I apologize for the poor quality and the lateness. I am livid and am doing an investigation as to how this happened,"
And when you tank the economy thanks to your socialist buddies will you hold an investigation as well?
Rally for Canada.
Brilliant Lefty Logic
Ed Broadbent says:
"I have no doubt that is how they see it in the short run, but we are doing what should be done in a parliamentary democracy," he said.
It has almost never been done at the federal level before, and not in living memory despite many minority governments. I wonder why.
Hey, I remember back in 2006. Some of analysts were wondering if Paul Martin would try and cling to power by attempting a coalition with the NDP. They were wondering this because they felt the concession speech was a long time in the making. The Liberal representative said something along the lines of, "hell no, Paul has too much respect for democracy for that to happen".
"They're trying to turn a serious economic situation into a political crisis. We will say we objected because there is a serious economic situation for Canadians."
The opposition's proposed economic stimulus package, Broadbent said, contains similar measures to ones planned by U.S. president-elect Barack Obama in the wake of the global economic crisis.
True, we are differing on how to deal with it. Though, we are NOT in recession yet.
"Other countries are doing it and we should be doing it here," he said.
Haha, brilliant. Mr Broadbent, I used to have respect for you. So because other countries are doing something we should to?
I guess Canada should have gone to Iraq after all, other countries did. I guess Canada should stay in Afghanistan, other countries are.
Sad logic indeed.
"I have no doubt that is how they see it in the short run, but we are doing what should be done in a parliamentary democracy," he said.
It has almost never been done at the federal level before, and not in living memory despite many minority governments. I wonder why.
Hey, I remember back in 2006. Some of analysts were wondering if Paul Martin would try and cling to power by attempting a coalition with the NDP. They were wondering this because they felt the concession speech was a long time in the making. The Liberal representative said something along the lines of, "hell no, Paul has too much respect for democracy for that to happen".
"They're trying to turn a serious economic situation into a political crisis. We will say we objected because there is a serious economic situation for Canadians."
The opposition's proposed economic stimulus package, Broadbent said, contains similar measures to ones planned by U.S. president-elect Barack Obama in the wake of the global economic crisis.
True, we are differing on how to deal with it. Though, we are NOT in recession yet.
"Other countries are doing it and we should be doing it here," he said.
Haha, brilliant. Mr Broadbent, I used to have respect for you. So because other countries are doing something we should to?
I guess Canada should have gone to Iraq after all, other countries did. I guess Canada should stay in Afghanistan, other countries are.
Sad logic indeed.
The Liberal Party of Cowards
The Liberal Party of Canada is comprised of sniveling, conniving, cowards. Remember, in the last session of Parliament they abstained, were absent, or had most of their party missing 43 times. They didn't have the courage of their convictions then, they didn't have the courage to face voters then, and they don't have the courage to face voters now.
That's right, they lost the election but feel they are right. They say 62% of Canadians are behind them despite polls not supporting that. They don't have the courage to take their coalition to the people, the people they claim to have a mandate from.
The Liberals are Cowards.
(And yes I am aware of the irony of having an anonymous blog. But, I am not claiming to represent the people of this great country in order to take control.)
That's right, they lost the election but feel they are right. They say 62% of Canadians are behind them despite polls not supporting that. They don't have the courage to take their coalition to the people, the people they claim to have a mandate from.
The Liberals are Cowards.
(And yes I am aware of the irony of having an anonymous blog. But, I am not claiming to represent the people of this great country in order to take control.)
Parizeau's Predictions
I have been calling this coalition the "Coalition of Usurpers", but perhaps it should be called the "Architects of Canada's Destruction" instead.
"Parizeau predicted in 1991 that the Bloc would create a chaotic "Italian-style parliament" in Ottawa, a place so dysfunctional that it would help lead to the breakup of Canada."
Of course this how coalition government will really annoy the West, and cause a lot of people in central Canada pain as well. All this will cause great satisfaction to the separatists.
The talk show hosts are all talking about how the vitriol against Quebec has ramped up significantly since this coalition was announced.
This coalition is causing great harm to this country, why can't the NDP and the Liberals see this?
"Parizeau predicted in 1991 that the Bloc would create a chaotic "Italian-style parliament" in Ottawa, a place so dysfunctional that it would help lead to the breakup of Canada."
Of course this how coalition government will really annoy the West, and cause a lot of people in central Canada pain as well. All this will cause great satisfaction to the separatists.
The talk show hosts are all talking about how the vitriol against Quebec has ramped up significantly since this coalition was announced.
This coalition is causing great harm to this country, why can't the NDP and the Liberals see this?
"Reducing taxes doesn't put money in people's pockets"
Above, that is a direct quote from CTV's Craig Oliver. This interview is pure drivel, he is incredibly biased and almost disrespectful to the Minister of Finance.
He is also an obvious Obama lover, saying why are you more like Obama. Obama is doing this, Obama is doing that.
The Minister of Finance was calm, serious, factual, and respectful. Oliver tries to bait him on multiple occasions.
It was a pretty shameful interview, and it aptly shows why I hate watching CTV's Question Period. Not just bad theme music, but biased hosts. I suppose if Craig Oliver wants to get involved in politics he should run for office.
He is also an obvious Obama lover, saying why are you more like Obama. Obama is doing this, Obama is doing that.
The Minister of Finance was calm, serious, factual, and respectful. Oliver tries to bait him on multiple occasions.
It was a pretty shameful interview, and it aptly shows why I hate watching CTV's Question Period. Not just bad theme music, but biased hosts. I suppose if Craig Oliver wants to get involved in politics he should run for office.
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Finally, a poll about the "Coalition of Usurpers"
About time, their has been a poll finally released about this whole debacle. The results are pretty mixed bag, with some good, and some bad.
First the bad:
As for the 75% that want an immediate stimulus package, well, they are the electorate, but perhaps if the Conservatives explained why they are waiting that number would drop. I would assume the Conservatives are waiting to introduce a stimulus package because they want the finance department to be very sure on what they are investing in, the returns to be expected on this, and the impact on the budget.
Not even the coalition of usurpers knows what will be in their stimulus package other then 30 billion.
First the bad:
- Support for the Opposition coalition: 37 per cent
- Only 35 per cent saying the party should continue to govern and 40 per cent wanting change
- A full 75 per cent thought the government should implement a stimulus package as soon as possible
- People wanting to hold a federal election: 32 per cent, with 24 percent not sure (OK this could break bad)
- 57 per cent agreed with the statement that they were "worried about the Bloc Quebecois becoming involved in the federal government."
- 64 per cent of Canadians across Canada said they would be uncomfortable with Dion as leader of the government (this includes 60% in Ontario)
- 48 per cent sent thought the parties should rely solely on their own fundraising
As for the 75% that want an immediate stimulus package, well, they are the electorate, but perhaps if the Conservatives explained why they are waiting that number would drop. I would assume the Conservatives are waiting to introduce a stimulus package because they want the finance department to be very sure on what they are investing in, the returns to be expected on this, and the impact on the budget.
Not even the coalition of usurpers knows what will be in their stimulus package other then 30 billion.
How Canadian Democracy Really Works
A.k.a the real world.
Another open letter to all coalition supporters. This is a slightly expanded version of a post I made on the original of this topic.
First off, to all of you who will call me names, I know exactly how the government is supposed to work. I have known since grade 4 history. Yet, you forget, that there is a strong difference between theory and real life. This is pretty typical of left wing supporters. I mean, Communism is an ideal system of government in theory.
In Canada, people vote for the Prime Minister and the Party. That is not what they are supposed to do or how it's supposed to work, but that is what they do. This is a fact you must admit, it's the truth.
That is why pollsters ask questions like
"Who do you think will make the best Prime Minister?"
"Who do you think will make the best Prime Minister?"
If Harper loses the confidence of the house, the house should fall, and the Governor General should dissolve it. We have another election. That is the only option.
Every single time (only once was it refused back in 1926) in the history of Canada, when the PM advises the Governor General to dissolve the house, the Governor General has done so. Whenever the Prime Minister has requested the Governor General to prorogue parliament, the Governor General has done so. The Governor General acts on advice of the Prime Minister.
Think of it this way, what would you say if the Governor General refused to ratify a bill legalizing marijuana that passed both the Senate and House? She refuses to sign it into law as she has serious misgivings about the message this law's passage sends to the youth of this nation. Technically it is within her powers to not grant Royal Assent, would you agree to this? I wouldn't.
If your majority is as popular as you think it is, then it should be no problem to win the election, right?
Another open letter to all coalition supporters. This is a slightly expanded version of a post I made on the original of this topic.
First off, to all of you who will call me names, I know exactly how the government is supposed to work. I have known since grade 4 history. Yet, you forget, that there is a strong difference between theory and real life. This is pretty typical of left wing supporters. I mean, Communism is an ideal system of government in theory.
In Canada, people vote for the Prime Minister and the Party. That is not what they are supposed to do or how it's supposed to work, but that is what they do. This is a fact you must admit, it's the truth.
That is why pollsters ask questions like
"Who do you think will make the best Prime Minister?"
- Stephen Harper
- Stephane Dion
- etc
"Who do you think will make the best Prime Minister?"
- A Conservative MP
- A Liberal MP
- etc
If Harper loses the confidence of the house, the house should fall, and the Governor General should dissolve it. We have another election. That is the only option.
Every single time (only once was it refused back in 1926) in the history of Canada, when the PM advises the Governor General to dissolve the house, the Governor General has done so. Whenever the Prime Minister has requested the Governor General to prorogue parliament, the Governor General has done so. The Governor General acts on advice of the Prime Minister.
Think of it this way, what would you say if the Governor General refused to ratify a bill legalizing marijuana that passed both the Senate and House? She refuses to sign it into law as she has serious misgivings about the message this law's passage sends to the youth of this nation. Technically it is within her powers to not grant Royal Assent, would you agree to this? I wouldn't.
If your majority is as popular as you think it is, then it should be no problem to win the election, right?
Oh, so now it's the "Coalition for Change"
I guess "Coalition for Canada" isn't good enough for them anymore. Or perhaps they couldn't get the Bloc to sign onto the name. Gee I wonder why. They should change their name to the "Coalition of Usurpers", it would be more accurate.
Tabernak.
The "Coalition of Usurpers" are now starting their own PR war, with two known websites at this time. You can see them here and here.
Now, how much will this cost us? Well, according to the FP, at least another billion to Quebec. It will also through a lifeline to the Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois.
Even the sovereignty movement can put up with Stéphane Dion as prime minister of a coalition government in Ottawa if it means an additional $1 billion in equalization payments for Quebec, Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois said last night.
Tabernak indeed.
Tabernak.
The "Coalition of Usurpers" are now starting their own PR war, with two known websites at this time. You can see them here and here.
Now, how much will this cost us? Well, according to the FP, at least another billion to Quebec. It will also through a lifeline to the Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois.
Even the sovereignty movement can put up with Stéphane Dion as prime minister of a coalition government in Ottawa if it means an additional $1 billion in equalization payments for Quebec, Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois said last night.
Tabernak indeed.
Canadian Labour Congress Launches Ads in Support of the Coalition
By Tuesday afternoon, the Canadian Labour Congress countered, coming out out with a series of 16 radio ads supporting the coalition and calling for Canadians to attend rallies to show their support for the proposed new government.
Is this even legal for a 3rd party to advertise like this? To be honest, I don't know. But are we really surprised that a union is backing this deal? Unions that back the NDP. Unions that stand to get lots of tax dollars out of this....
Is this even legal for a 3rd party to advertise like this? To be honest, I don't know. But are we really surprised that a union is backing this deal? Unions that back the NDP. Unions that stand to get lots of tax dollars out of this....
To all coalition supporters
Repeat after me:
"You do not have a mandate"
"You do not have a mandate"
"You do not have a mandate"
"You do not have a mandate"
What? You say, We don't have a mandate? 62% of the electorate voted for us you right-wing numskull. Go drag your knuckles elsewhere.
Actually, that would be wrong. Zero people voted for this coalition. People voted for either the Liberals or the NDP to form government, not for the Liberals, NDP, and for all intents and purposes the Bloc to form government together. But hey, if you are so sure about the righteousness of your position, take it to the people. That is what responsible coalitions do, that campaign on them.
You're not afraid of the electorate are you?
"You do not have a mandate"
"You do not have a mandate"
"You do not have a mandate"
"You do not have a mandate"
What? You say, We don't have a mandate? 62% of the electorate voted for us you right-wing numskull. Go drag your knuckles elsewhere.
Actually, that would be wrong. Zero people voted for this coalition. People voted for either the Liberals or the NDP to form government, not for the Liberals, NDP, and for all intents and purposes the Bloc to form government together. But hey, if you are so sure about the righteousness of your position, take it to the people. That is what responsible coalitions do, that campaign on them.
You're not afraid of the electorate are you?
Cracks in the Coalition
Bourque is reporting that Iggy is having second thoughts, and perhaps more shocking, 15 opposition members are ready to break ranks and if necessary sit as independents.
Insiders are telling Bourque late this evening that "at least 15 opposition members are ready to break ranks and, if necessary, sit as independents. This group includes Dryden, Tonks, Bevilacqua (from Grits) and Angus (NDP)". Bourque is also hearing that "at least three Bloc members are considering same course of action and there maybe at least two Tories thinking of going the other way (as independents)
Insiders are telling Bourque late this evening that "at least 15 opposition members are ready to break ranks and, if necessary, sit as independents. This group includes Dryden, Tonks, Bevilacqua (from Grits) and Angus (NDP)". Bourque is also hearing that "at least three Bloc members are considering same course of action and there maybe at least two Tories thinking of going the other way (as independents)
Ralph Goodale refuses to endorse Dion
Ralph Goodale has refused to endorse Stephane Dion as Prime Minister. On CTV Newsnet he was asked point blank if Stephane Dion was the "right man for the job". Goodale's response was to only talk about Dion's constitutional rights as leader of the opposition. In other words, complete bafflegab when a simple "Hell Yes" would have worked. A key Liberal doesn't even support Dion.
Of course, in this same segment, Ralph Goodale also called the Conservatives liars. Outside of the House. Perhaps someone should sue him for slander? Goodale called the Conservatives liars about their statements regarding the Canadian flag and the signing ceremony between Dion, Layton, and Duceppe. Goodale said there were flags at the ceremony. Of course the Conservatives never said that there were no flags at the ceremony, they said there were no flags behind the three leaders during the ceremony. I guess Goodale doesn't just not listen to the Canadian people.
Rally for Canada.
Of course, in this same segment, Ralph Goodale also called the Conservatives liars. Outside of the House. Perhaps someone should sue him for slander? Goodale called the Conservatives liars about their statements regarding the Canadian flag and the signing ceremony between Dion, Layton, and Duceppe. Goodale said there were flags at the ceremony. Of course the Conservatives never said that there were no flags at the ceremony, they said there were no flags behind the three leaders during the ceremony. I guess Goodale doesn't just not listen to the Canadian people.
Rally for Canada.
Stand up for Canada
Stand up for Canada - Let the people speak
Two months ago, Canadians elected the Prime Minister with a strengthened mandate to address the global economic crisis.
Now, a Socialist-Separatist-driven coalition is attempting to overturn the results of the last election and impose a Prime Minister that Canadians rejected.
The Socialist-Separatist-driven coalition is:
- An attack on Canada - Separatist participation and a Separatist veto on national decisions
- An attack on Canada’s democracy - Canadians resoundingly rejected Stéphane Dion as Prime Minister
- An attack on Canada’s economy - The Liberals themselves called the NDP “economically-damaging”.
Canada’s Government will use every legal means possible to:
- Protect Canada - No Separatist Participation and No Separatist Veto
- Protect Canada’s democracy -No imposition of a radical new Government without the people’s consent
- Protect Canada’s economy - No economically-damaging agenda for the country
During a global economic crisis, Canada needs leadership. Canadian leadership. There can be no Socialist-Separatist-driven coalition without the people’s consent.
It’s time to Stand up for Canada.
It’s time to Let the people speak.
Contact Info for the leaders of this Coalition:
Stephane Dion
Phone: 613-996-5789
Fax: 613-996-6562
Jack Layton
Phone: 613-995-7224
Fax: 613-995-4565
Contact Info for the Governor General:
Phone: 613-993-8200
Email: smcook@gg.ca
(Sent by my MP)
Monday, December 1, 2008
Bye Bye Ms Minority Governments
Today, the Liberals, NDP, and the Bloc have banded together to oust the democratically elected government of Canada. Sure it's constitutional, but it's not right. The people already voted 42 days ago and Harper was re-elected.
They simply didn't like the results of the last election.
But, think beyond just the hapless Conservative government, think about the future. We now have a precedence for the opposition parties to overturn the results of elections. If they don't like the results then they can band together and defeat the winner of the election.
How will this make Canada stronger? Make our democracy more vibrant? The opposition cannot overturn the results of the election.
In this case, all the opposition parties hated Harper, they couldn't say one nice thing about him. So now the opposition parties get to play their politics and let us know that we the people are not worthy of deciding who should form government. Only their great progressive minds can judge our fate.
They simply didn't like the results of the last election.
But, think beyond just the hapless Conservative government, think about the future. We now have a precedence for the opposition parties to overturn the results of elections. If they don't like the results then they can band together and defeat the winner of the election.
How will this make Canada stronger? Make our democracy more vibrant? The opposition cannot overturn the results of the election.
In this case, all the opposition parties hated Harper, they couldn't say one nice thing about him. So now the opposition parties get to play their politics and let us know that we the people are not worthy of deciding who should form government. Only their great progressive minds can judge our fate.
Ouch! Hoisted on your own petard
Well it seems like a done deal now, the Conservative government will fall the first chance the opposition gets. Stephen Harper and the Conservatives could be regulated to the opposition. They have no one to blame but themselves, or perhaps more accurately, Stephen Harper and Jim Flaherty.
Of course this doesn't seem so brilliant or savvy now. But who could have predicted that the opposition would grow such a large set so quickly.
The Conservative's only hope is that the Governor-General will keep with tradition and act on the advice of the Prime Minister. That is, not exercise her (technically) constitutional powers and instead keep with tradition and only act on advice from the Prime Minister.
Will she side with tradition or side with the opposition in their blatant attempt to subvert the will of the people whom voted in the Conservatives with an increased mandate only 40 or so days ago. The Governor General doesn't have to ask for Stephane Dion to try and form a government, in fact, unless the Prime Minister requests it she will be violating long standing tradition and ignoring the advice of the public service, and of course past Liberal governments.
"Governor General do retain their right to use the Royal Prerogative in exceptional constitutional crisis situations[6], though the Canadian public service has stated that such actions may lack democratic legitimacy amongst the Canadian populace coming from an unelected institution. Liberal governments, for their part, have long adhered to the view that the Governor General does not have the right to refuse dissolution from the prime minister"
Stephane Dion only received 28% of the vote, and now due to backroom deals he will be Prime Minister of this country.
Crazy!
Of course this doesn't seem so brilliant or savvy now. But who could have predicted that the opposition would grow such a large set so quickly.
The Conservative's only hope is that the Governor-General will keep with tradition and act on the advice of the Prime Minister. That is, not exercise her (technically) constitutional powers and instead keep with tradition and only act on advice from the Prime Minister.
Will she side with tradition or side with the opposition in their blatant attempt to subvert the will of the people whom voted in the Conservatives with an increased mandate only 40 or so days ago. The Governor General doesn't have to ask for Stephane Dion to try and form a government, in fact, unless the Prime Minister requests it she will be violating long standing tradition and ignoring the advice of the public service, and of course past Liberal governments.
"Governor General do retain their right to use the Royal Prerogative in exceptional constitutional crisis situations[6], though the Canadian public service has stated that such actions may lack democratic legitimacy amongst the Canadian populace coming from an unelected institution. Liberal governments, for their part, have long adhered to the view that the Governor General does not have the right to refuse dissolution from the prime minister"
Stephane Dion only received 28% of the vote, and now due to backroom deals he will be Prime Minister of this country.
Crazy!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)